Saudi Pro League Round 6 Review
Round 6
Monday, 7 September 2026
Tuesday, 8 September 2026
Wednesday, 9 September 2026
Data last changed:
Three teams reach 15 points as narrow wins shape the round
Al Hilal, Al Nassr and Al Qadsiah finished the sixth matchweek level on 15 points, while seven of the nine games produced a winner. The Saudi Pro League Round 6 review finds 20 goals again, but a different outcome pattern from Round 5: five home wins, two away wins and two draws.
This review covers the completed 2026/27 round played from 7 to 9 September, not the later fixtures now reflected in the live standings. Every score below is final in the official league record, and every round total is calculated from the same nine-result evidence set.
Complete Saudi Pro League Round 6 results: all nine fixtures are final
The Saudi Pro League Round 6 review accounts for all 18 clubs once, with no postponed or unresolved fixture omitted. The opening day supplied two clean sheets, the second day included two home wins and a goalless draw, and the final day ended with three 2–1 results.
Al Khaleej and Al Riyadh began with a scoreless draw before NEOM won 2–0 at Al Hilal. Al Ettifaq and Al Faisaly then shared another 0–0, Al Hazem beat Al Taawoun 1–0, Al Qadsiah edged Al Ahli 3–2, and Al Ittihad defeated Al Fayha 2–1.
The closing set completed the Saudi Pro League Round 6 review: Al Kholood beat Al Shabab 2–1, Diriyah won 2–1 at Al Fateh, and Al Nassr recorded the same score against Abha. Those results yield nine completed matches, seven wins and two draws, so the outcome count reconciles exactly.
| Date | Home team | Final score | Away team |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Sep | Al Khaleej | 0–0 | Al Riyadh |
| 7 Sep | Al Hilal | 0–2 | NEOM |
| 8 Sep | Al Ettifaq | 0–0 | Al Faisaly |
| 8 Sep | Al Hazem | 1–0 | Al Taawoun |
| 8 Sep | Al Qadsiah | 3–2 | Al Ahli |
| 8 Sep | Al Ittihad | 2–1 | Al Fayha |
| 9 Sep | Al Kholood | 2–1 | Al Shabab |
| 9 Sep | Al Fateh | 1–2 | Diriyah |
| 9 Sep | Al Nassr | 2–1 | Abha |
Saudi Pro League Round 6 goals: 17 came from five matches
The scoring calculation in this Saudi Pro League Round 6 review is straightforward: 11 home goals plus nine away goals equals 20. Dividing 20 by nine gives 2.22 goals per match when rounded to two decimal places, the same headline average as the previous round.
That average hides a strong split in the distribution. Two matches ended 0–0, Al Hazem–Al Taawoun contained one goal, and Al Hilal–NEOM contained two; the other five matches supplied 17 goals, or 85% of the entire round total.
Four of those five higher-scoring games finished 2–1, while Al Qadsiah–Al Ahli reached five goals at 3–2. Consequently, the median match total was three goals even though the two scoreless draws pulled the mean down to 2.22.
| Total goals in a match | Matches | Goals contributed |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Total | 9 | 20 |
This distribution gives the Saudi Pro League Round 6 review a clearer explanation than calling the week simply high- or low-scoring. Most goals came from a majority of matches, but two fixtures contributed none and only one fixture exceeded three goals.
Al Qadsiah were the only team to score three times, while seven clubs reached at least two goals. Nine clubs did not score, exactly half of the participants, because the two 0–0 draws account for four scoreless teams and four other defeats also ended without a goal.
Five home wins, two away wins and six one-goal margins
Home teams won five times in the Saudi Pro League Round 6 review: Al Hazem, Al Qadsiah, Al Ittihad, Al Kholood and Al Nassr. NEOM and Diriyah supplied the two away wins, while the other two games finished level.
The home sides also scored more, but the two measures are not identical. They produced 11 goals against nine for the visitors and collected 17 match points, compared with eight for away teams; those totals include one point for each side in each draw.
Seven decisive matches distributed 21 points and two draws distributed four, for 25 points awarded across the round. That is two fewer than the 27 possible if every fixture had produced a winner, because each draw reduces the combined return by one point.
| Venue category | Goals | Wins | Draws | Match points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home teams | 11 | 5 | 2 | 17 |
| Away teams | 9 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Combined | 20 | 7 | 4 team draw entries | 25 |
Six of the seven wins were decided by one goal. Al Hazem’s 1–0 and the five results ending 2–1 or 3–2 all belong to that group; NEOM’s 2–0 at Al Hilal was the only two-goal margin and therefore the round’s largest victory.
The Saudi Pro League Round 6 review can describe those margins without turning them into tactical claims. A one-goal result establishes the final gap, but it does not by itself prove which team controlled play, created better chances or deserved the result.
Six team clean sheets, generated by four matches
Six teams kept clean sheets in the Saudi Pro League Round 6 review, but those six cases came from only four games. Al Khaleej, Al Riyadh, Al Ettifaq and Al Faisaly each received a clean sheet from the two 0–0 draws, while NEOM and Al Hazem won without conceding.
This distinction prevents a common counting error. A scoreless draw creates two team clean sheets rather than one match clean sheet, so the two draws contribute four of the six team cases.
Five matches saw both teams score: Al Qadsiah–Al Ahli and each of the four 2–1 results involving Al Ittihad, Al Kholood, Diriyah and Al Nassr. The other four matches had at least one scoreless side, matching the four games that produced all six clean-sheet cases.
| Result type | Matches | Team clean sheets |
|---|---|---|
| Scoreless draws | 2 | 4 |
| NEOM 2–0 away win | 1 | 1 |
| Al Hazem 1–0 home win | 1 | 1 |
| Both teams scored | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 6 |
The safe inference is narrow: this round combined two goalless games with five matches in which both sides scored. The scorelines do not support claims about shot quality, goalkeeping performance or defensive control unless those separate statistics are introduced and verified.
Saudi Pro League Round 6 standings: three teams reached 15 points
The official end-of-round report places Al Hilal first on goal difference, with Al Nassr and Al Qadsiah also on 15 points. That historical snapshot belongs to the close of Round 6 and should not be confused with the live table after subsequent league matches.
The Saudi Pro League Round 6 review explains how the round itself affected that group. Al Hilal took no points from the 0–2 home defeat, while Al Nassr and Al Qadsiah each added three, so both reached the leader’s 15-point total.
NEOM’s win returned the club to fifth on 12 points, according to the same official recap. Al Kholood also reached 12 points after beating Al Shabab, with the league report recording three wins and three draws from the club’s first six matches.
| Verified position context after Round 6 | Club | Points | Round 6 points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st on goal difference | Al Hilal | 15 | 0 |
| Level with the leader | Al Nassr | 15 | 3 |
| Level with the leader | Al Qadsiah | 15 | 3 |
| Returned to 5th | NEOM | 12 | 3 |
| Recorded in 6th | Al Kholood | 12 | 3 |
This table is deliberately limited to positions and totals stated in official round reports. It does not reconstruct the full historical standings from today’s table, and it does not use later results to fill gaps in the Round 6 snapshot.
The three-way tie is therefore the most defensible standings conclusion from the Saudi Pro League Round 6 review. It describes an exact moment in the season: Al Hilal retained first place by goal difference, while two winning challengers closed the points gap completely.
What changed from Round 5 even though the goal total did not
The Round 5 review also recorded 20 goals in nine matches, so the total and 2.22 average were unchanged. The distribution of outcomes moved, however, from three home wins, three away wins and three draws to five home wins, two away wins and two draws.
Clean sheets also fell from nine team cases to six. Round 5 contained five wins to nil plus two scoreless draws, whereas this Saudi Pro League Round 6 review contains only two wins to nil and the same number of 0–0 results.
| Round comparison | Round 5 | Round 6 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| Goals | 20 | 20 | 0 |
| Goals per match | 2.22 | 2.22 | 0.00 |
| Home wins | 3 | 5 | +2 |
| Away wins | 3 | 2 | −1 |
| Draws | 3 | 2 | −1 |
| Team clean sheets | 9 | 6 | −3 |
This is a comparison of two verified rounds, not evidence of a lasting season trend. Two data points show how similar goal totals can emerge from different result patterns, but they cannot establish that home advantage or scoring conditions have permanently changed.
Saudi Pro League Round 6 by the numbers and the practical takeaway
The Saudi Pro League Round 6 review ends with a full reconciliation: five home wins plus two away wins plus two draws equals nine matches. The 11 home goals and nine away goals equal 20, while six team clean sheets arise from two scoreless draws and two wins to nil.
| Round 6 measure | Verified calculation |
|---|---|
| Completed matches | 9 |
| Total goals | 20 |
| Goals per match | 2.22 |
| Home / away wins / draws | 5 / 2 / 2 |
| Home / away goals | 11 / 9 |
| Team clean sheets | 6 |
| Both teams scored | 5 matches |
| One-goal wins | 6 |
| Largest margin | NEOM over Al Hilal, 2 goals |
| Highest-scoring match | Al Qadsiah 3–2 Al Ahli, 5 goals |
The useful conclusion is not just that 20 goals were scored. Six narrow victories created a heavily decisive round, and the different results of the three clubs that entered the final snapshot on 15 points compressed the lead without removing Al Hilal from first place.
Readers can use the league hub for the current competition picture or the results page for later scores. This Saudi Pro League Round 6 review remains a fixed account of one completed matchweek, so its historical points references should not replace the live standings.
Official sources and calculation limits
The official Saudi Pro League Round 6 recap confirms the round’s completion, 20-goal total and the top-end standings context. Official reports also document the opening-day results, the Al Hazem and Al Ettifaq matches, the Al Kholood win, and the closing Al Nassr and Diriyah wins.
All averages, venue splits, margins, clean-sheet counts and round-to-round differences are independent calculations from the complete final-score table. The article makes no claim about possession, shots, expected goals, tactical superiority or deserved outcomes, because those are not established by the result set used here.
The figures in this analysis come from our declared data source, and anything we get wrong is fixed on our corrections page.

















